What Are We Looking for Again I Know Right

• Overview
• Findings Q&A
• Methodology Q&A
• Respondents' quotes
• Related

The results are primarily intended to inform EU institutions, Member Country governments and institutions – including National Human being Rights Institutions, Equality Bodies and Ombuds Institutions – alongside homo rights defenders and civil social club organisations, about the identify of central rights in EU societies – based on what people remember and experience. The findings provide an evidence base to inform action on central rights, which – ultimately – can be used to accomplish an bear upon on key rights in practice and to ensure the effective implementation of fundamental rights obligations.

FRA will publish further results from the survey in 2020–2021, both in study format too as through an interactive online data explorer.

This is an overview of the main findings from the 'What do rights mean for people in the EU?' study drawn from FRA'southward Cardinal Rights Survey. Information technology is the starting time comprehensive, European union-wide survey of people's experiences and views on fundamental rights.

See our methodology Q&A for more data on how FRA carried out the survey.

Why was this survey needed?

For some people primal/human rights, commonwealth and rule of law feel far from their everyday lives and concerns. Just they underpin freedom, equality and the smooth performance of society. They are likewise founding values of the EU.

Discussions on cardinal rights exercise not necessarily reflect what people sympathise past them or how they feel them in their everyday lives, nor do they necessarily reflect what people are about concerned nearly.

With this in listen, the survey explores how people in the EU view autonomous values. Can they savour their fundamental rights? Practice they think the courts and media function freely? What do they remember about politicians and about corruption?

FRA's survey captured the views of old and young, people with different levels of education, men and women, those who are struggling on their present income, and those who are comfortably off.

The results will aid policymakers and human being rights organisations make evidence-based decisions to promote and protect homo rights.

What exercise people recollect about human being rights?

• 88 % of people in the EU say that human rights are important for creating a fairer society. Simply 68 % think that some people take unfair advantage of human rights.
• The survey results reveal stark differences between countries and groups in social club. People's views differ significantly, depending on their age, gender, wealth, level of education or whether they alive in the countryside or in the city. For example, more people with lower incomes or longstanding health issues believe that human rights bring unfair benefits to some people.
• 33 % believe that human rights simply benefit those who do not deserve them, such as criminals and terrorists. This goes upwardly to 44% for people who detect it difficult to make ends see. By educational level, 41 % with lower secondary instruction or less share this view, but just 23 % with higher education.
• In xi out of 27 EU Member States, 50 % or more agree that human being rights abuses are not really a trouble in their country, but instead are something that happens 'elsewhere'. People who find it difficult to make ends run into are less probable to share this view: 43 % exercise so, compared with 54 % of people who easily make ends meet.

What do people recall nearly elections and opposition parties?

• People clearly value democratic principles, especially gratis and off-white elections: 86% believe that these are very of import for commonwealth.
• Merely views vary by historic period. To older people, certain aspects of commonwealth are more than important than to younger people. For example, only 58 % of young people aged 16-29 think that information technology is important that opposition parties tin freely criticise the government. This compares to 69 % of people 65 years and older.
• The survey asked questions on the importance of complimentary elections and the disquisitional role of opposition parties. Nonetheless, the Agency does not accept a mandate to monitor the democratic performance of our societies. This task lies with the EU institutions and EU Member States.

Do people experience represented past political parties?

• Most people (60 %) think that mainstream parties and politicians exercise non care about them. This rises to staggering 73% for people who struggle to brand ends meet. By comparison, but 45 % of those who easily make ends meet share this view.
• 63 % recollect that people have amend chances of being hired if they belong to the political party that is in ability. This view is once again more common among people with lower incomes. Information technology also varies land by country – for example, from over fourscore % in Republic of croatia, Hellenic republic and N Republic of macedonia to under thirty % in Denmark, the Netherlands and Sweden.

Practise people think that judges tin can act independently?

• 27 % think that judges in their country are non free from government influence.
• There are meaning differences between countries – the results range from 47 % in Croatia and 65 % in North Republic of macedonia to 11 % in both Denmark and Finland.
• People who struggle to make ends meet are more likely (35 %) to say that judges are never or rarely free from regime influence, compared to 22 % of those who tin can easily get by with their income.
• 21 % also think that NGOs and charities cannot work without government intimidation.

Are people treated equally when dealing with public administration?

• 11 % call up they were not treated equally by public administration. This rises to 17 % for people who struggle financially.
• In that location are no differences between genders - the same proportion of men and women say they have not been treated equally.
• When it comes to education, people with higher levels of education say they have experienced problems with public administration more often than those who completed at most lower secondary education (50 % vs 36 %).

How do people view abuse beyond Europe?

• Only 4 % take been asked by a public official for a favour, souvenir or donation.
• But at that place are stark differences between countries and sectors. In some countries, almost every fifth person has been asked for a favour, gift or donation when dealing with public administration or hospital.
• 48 % of immature people would find it adequate to give a gift or exercise a favour, compared with under 35 % in other age groups.
• Corruption in healthcare is a particular problem; over sixty % of people in Hungary, Slovakia, Croatia and Latvia consider it common for people to offer favours to speed upward access to healthcare. Moreover, in Slovakia, Czechia and Republic of croatia, a bulk consider it acceptable to sometimes give a gift or practice a favour for a public official to have their affair dealt with more speedily.

Are people aware of the EU Lease of Fundamental Rights?

• 53 % of Europeans are aware of the Eu Charter of Fundamental Rights, 10 years subsequently it became legally binding across the European union.
• More people have heard almost the European Convention on Human Rights (68 %) and the Universal Declaration of Homo Rights (67 %), which are both long-standing human rights instruments.
• Sensation of human rights instruments is lower amongst people with lower education and those who struggle to brand ends come across. For example, awareness drops from 93 % for university-educated people to 65 % of people who accept lower secondary education.

What should the European union and Member States do to ensure that Europeans can enjoy their rights equally?

FRA calls on the EU and Member States to use the survey evidence as a wake-up call to put forrad wide-ranging efforts to ensure that fundamental rights deliver real benefits to anybody and everywhere across the EU.

In item, the Agency suggests:

1. Communicate more finer on rights – fundamental rights are for all; promote the benefits of fundamental rights and brand sure everyone can savor them, especially those who struggle to brand ends run across and believe these rights do non apply to them.
2. Focus on young people – reach out to and engage with young people to encourage them to accept function in decision making, and so they tin can support shaping future policies.
3. Involve those who feel 'left backside' – accomplish out to those who feel 'left behind', consider them in the decision-making process and show that their opinions thing.
4. Improve trust in judiciary – ameliorate public trust in the judiciary by safeguarding the independence of judges and courts. Share best practices across countries and learn from each other.
5. Make public services accessible to all – ensure unhampered admission to public information and services, especially for those who have long-standing health bug and/or disabilities.
6. Fight abuse – exercise not let corruption violate people's rights, peculiarly in healthcare. Governments should adopt zero tolerance towards corruption as it erodes public conviction.

This is a cursory overview of how FRA carried out its Fundamental Rights Survey. More details volition be available in the forthcoming Technical Report.

It is the kickoff comprehensive, EU-wide survey of people's experiences and views on fundamental rights.

Run across our main findings Q&A for more data on the survey results.

Who took role in the survey?

The survey was open to individuals aged sixteen years and older who take lived in the survey country at least 1 year before the survey. In each land, a randomly selected sample of the population was contacted and invited to participate in the survey, to make sure that the results are representative of what people in the country feel and call up.

What questions did the survey ask?

The survey asked respondents about a wide range of bug. These include: personal security and safety; tolerance and equality; rights awareness and responsibilities; personal discrimination; everyday life experiences and technology. It also collected information on socio-demographic characteristics.

The results published today focus on respondents' opinions about human being rights, operation of society, and public bodies that have a duty to enforce human rights law and protect people's rights.

When and where was the survey carried out?

The survey was carried out beyond the 27 European union Fellow member States, the United Kingdom and N Macedonia from January to October 2019.

How was the survey carried out?

The survey aimed to provide reliable and comparable data on the views and experiences of people across the European union. It involves a combination of face-to-confront and online data drove, as appropriate in each country, to reach a representative sample of the total population.

In 19 countries, trained interviewers contacted the respondents in person. They asked interviewed respondents and asked them to complete the survey using a tablet computer.

In 10 countries, respondents were asked to complete the questionnaire online. They received letters by mail inviting them to participate in the survey.

In France and Germany, already existing online panels were used to invite people to take role in the survey. In these ii countries, quotas ensured that the sample size corresponded with the structure of the total population in terms of historic period, gender, employment status, teaching and region.

Ipsos MORI colllected the data on behalf of FRA, in cooperation with Statistics Netherlands (CBS) in the Netherlands, the Centre des Technologies de l'Information de fifty'Etat (CTIE) in Luxembourg and Statistics Austria in Austria.

Why did FRA use unlike survey methods?

The terminal survey methodology used in each country depended on the method best suited for each land. This choice was based on an expert consultation, a feasibility study, pre-testing and an earlier pilot written report.

How many respondents completed the survey?

In total 34,948 people completed the survey.

Who are the survey respondents? Where are they from, what is their age?

Some one,000 people completed the questionnaire in each land, except Germany and France, where almost 3,000 participants completed the survey as online panels were used.

Are the results representative?

The results are representative at the European union level too as for each country for people who are 16 years or older.

How was the privacy, anonymity and confidentiality of respondents bodacious?

Professional person interviewers, trained to ensure confidentiality, carried out the face-to-face interviews. Online data collection, on the other mitt, immune respondents to consummate the survey when and where they wanted. The survey data was stored securely and afterwards anonymised. The final dataset does not comprise whatever personal information that would allow respondents to be identified. The survey results are presented in tables and graphs which aggregate the results for a large number of respondents, further ensuring that individual respondents cannot exist recognised.

Will the survey information be publicly bachelor?

FRA will release the results in defended survey reports, likewise equally integrated into various other FRA reports.

FRA will also make an extensive set of survey results available through an online information explorer on its website in November 2020.

It also aims to make the microdata and full dataset available in 2021-2022.

How much did the survey price?

The external contracts for the survey, including the airplane pilot phase, cost €iv,000,986. Lowering costs while existence inclusive and obtaining representative results for all countries was a consideration in chosing the national survey methods.

This report will be the first in a series of thematic reports cartoon on the survey results.

Can you put a ranking of countries based on the results? Which country is doing best/worse?

FRA does non rank European union Fellow member States in its reports. However, FRA'due south reports present fundamental results by country, and afterwards on people will exist able to apply the survey's data explorer to run across more individual country results relative to other countries with respect to specific survey questions.

What do people retrieve and know near human rights?

"Homo rights are losing their importance, we must not forget that they are the foundations of our republic."
(Adult female, between 30 and 44 years erstwhile, survey respondent, France)

"In practice, basic human rights do not utilize to all citizens every bit and there exist offset and second grade citizens."
(Adult female, between 45 and 54 years old, survey respondent, Croatia)

"I have been heartened by recent referenda regarding same-sex matrimony, abortion and divorce […] and I feel proud to be a citizen and office of positive cultural modify."
(Woman, betwixt 30 and 44 years erstwhile, survey respondent, Republic of ireland)

"Republic of estonia is mostly a state where human rights are respected, merely the problem is, in my opinion, that information technology is difficult to cope for people with low incomes (pensioners, people with disabilities)."
(Man, between 16 and 29 years one-time, survey respondent, Republic of estonia)

Views on the performance of democratic club and political participation

"The netherlands is mainly doing okay with protecting human rights, but would exercise well to continue to focus on a more transparent and more citizen-oriented democracy."
(Man, between 16 and 29 years old, survey respondent, holland)

"So what I think is important, everybody e'er says that we can't change anything anyways, but it is at least a small get-go to go to vote, I mean how many youths don't go to vote at all anymore. And and so they ultimately become upset nearly the ones who are withal there."
(Woman, betwixt 18 and 29 years old, focus-group participant, Germany)

"Homo rights are followed when ane has political contacts. The mutual person is unprotected."
(Woman, 65+ years old, survey respondent, Espana)

"Judges must non be interfered with, we must let them do their job. Then I recollect nosotros'll have a skilful judicial system."
(Human being, 65+ years former, focus-group participant, Greece)

"You need connections to be appointed a judge in the get-go identify, so the influence begins even at this stage."
(Woman, between 45 and 54 years onetime, focus-grouping participant, Bulgaria)

Admission to and information about rights – role of and treatment by public services, including corruption

"I retrieve nosotros take to look up too much ourselves about our rights. Nosotros practise not become informed enough."
(Woman, 65+ years erstwhile, survey respondent, Belgium)

"As a mother of a disabled child, it is appalling to experience how piddling assistance and guidance yous go far relation to rights, opportunities etc."
(Woman, between 30 and 44 years erstwhile, survey respondent, Kingdom of denmark)

"I would like public regime to guarantee and defend my rights and the rights of other people and that the laws should work equally for all."
(Woman, between 45 and 54 years former, survey respondent, Lithuania)

"An application I made to a national potency was rejected without caption. I made a complaint and expect the response for 6 months... is a matter of health..."
(Man, 65+ years old, survey respondent, Republic of cyprus)

"I notice information technology very difficult to obtain information regarding, for instance, alimony weather condition, etc., since the French country and the Danish state do not necessarily work together. Information technology can be seen every bit a major obstacle to the free move of European union countries."
(Man, between 54 and 64 years erstwhile, survey respondent, Denmark)

"The public administration works too slowly, it sometimes takes weeks to receive a response to requests, and when it does, the information is so cluttered that it cannot be understood."
(Man, 65+ years old, survey respondent, Germany)

"Public infirmary doctors always expect a gift in order to take better intendance of yous."
(Human being, between 16 and 29 years erstwhile, survey respondent, Cyprus)

"For example when you have to pay heavy money to the gynaecologist and so that you volition be treated as a human being in the hospital — and that'due south admittedly full general, there'southward nothing unusual well-nigh it."
(Woman, between 30 and 44 years onetime, focus-group participant, Republic of hungary)

juarezactemend1952.blogspot.com

Source: https://fra.europa.eu/en/publication/2020/fundamental-rights-survey-trust

Share this post